The ANSWER Einstein looked for Issued: July 10th 2018.

ANSWER in htm: - *http://amperefitz.com/answer.htm*

Also ANSWER in Word: - *http://amperefitz.com/answer.doc*

And ANSWER in Adobe pdf: - *http://amperefitz.com/answer.pdf*

For the very latest in science, click links below:

*c.squared.html 11-25-2017**c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017* (Adobe)*c.squared.doc 11-25-2017* (Word)

Not Quite Everything for a

Theory of Everything

but we do indeed

have a model

Here's the model:

- The speed of gravity

An important part of the model has been given to us by our astronomers. All the astronomical departments in all of the world's universities teach their students -- *what Newton said *-- that gravity acts instantly and this must be included in their math. There are proofs we simply would not have a stable universe if the speed of gravity was as slow as the speed of light. Astronomers are taught this and most of them accept this as a fact.

Light travels at 300, 000, 000 meters per second or 3x10^{8 }meters per second.

Now let's square this 300, 000, 000 meters: And we get 90, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000 meters or 9x10^{16 }meters.

Gravity, according to noted astronomer *Van Flandern* must be acting at about a speed of 9x10^{16 }meters per second and this would appear to us as *c*^{2} or the speed of light squared. Tom Van Flandern assured me, before he died, that this speed would be close enough to instantly for most astronomers to accept. Van Flandern showed us -- *while light had aberration* -- there was no aberration with gravity and at a speed of 9x10^{16 }meters per second, gravity would have no aberration.

The question now becomes: How can all this be happening?

2. **What the tensor math of General Relativity teaches us**

Here is a *quote *from the* Britannica 1997 CD* telling about Einstein's tensor math which **"***led him to an essentially unique tensor equation for the law of gravitation, in which gravitation emerged not as a force but as a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime.*

As you see in the above ** Britannica** quote, there is

*Saul Perlmutter* has shown, as in **GR**, that this repulsive force is really out there resulting in a return of Einstein's *cosmological constant* (exact opposite repulsive force of gravity) -- *between all the stars and galaxies keeping them apart* -- and gravity becomes -- *as Einstein originally thought* -- a bi-polar force like all the other invisible forces.

And **GR** shows us the same thing that creates force must also be creating space!

What is it?

It's the spin/orbital frequencies!

The electron orbitals just about cancel each other out leaving the electron spin frequency as the main cause of magnetic force but it's general knowledge that the orbital frequencies also cause the magnetic force.

What is not general knowledge yet is that if the electron's charge is being caused merely by relative motion (see: *http://www.rbduncan.com/pge1.html*) then the spins and orbitals of other items besides electrons also create force and space. Once you see this then you can also begin to see a model for a Theory of Everything.

The smallest space that we can see is that being produced by electron orbital frequencies. Probably the majority of the space we see is being produced by the spin frequencies of the stars. So our space becomes a limited bandspread in a Schrödinger type of frequency universe.

A big lesson here is that our space is limited from the high orbiting frequencies of the electrons to the lower spin frequencies of the stars. These are the parameters -- *or the bandspread* -- of our spacetime realm.

We have to divide this universe into spacetime realms (*frequency bandwidths*).

We can't see into the spacetime realm of the quark because the quark's spin frequency is simply too high for our spacetime realm but as Wheeler and Feynman showed us, we cannot measure what is outside of our spacetime realm but we certainly can detect it and we do: We detect this quark produced space as *c*^{2} or acceleration.

We also have failed to see the force being produced by the galactic spin frequencies. Proof of this is that we are measuring the speed of spiral galaxy arms as going faster than their escape velocity and this is impossible.

Not seeing this galactic force produced a flaw in R. T. Cahill's Quantum Foam Theory. Whereas he did indeed get the speed of gravity right.

All in all, electron spin frequencies produce magnetic force, and the spins of the various stars and galaxies produce Einstein's *cosmological constant* or this repulsive force between all the stars and galaxies, holding them apart, while the quark spins give us the vast majority of our gravitational and inertial forces.

Evidently there are at least two quark spin frequencies that -- at the exterior of a proton or neutron -- combine to form a harmonic that is the square of the electron's spin frequency.

Thus as you see the origin of *c*^{2} then Einstein's formula E=m*c*^{2} makes perfect sense.

If this is indeed a frequency universe such as *Milo Wolff's webSite* suggests then we do not as yet have quite everything to figure out this Schrödinger type frequency universe.

Be sure to read: *http://www.amperefitz.com/acceleratingexpandinguniverse.htm*

See this short, clear picture: *http://www.amperefitz.com/principle-of-equivalence.htm*

Also *http://www.amperefitz.com/aphaseuniverse.htm*

And *http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm*

& *http://www.amperefitz.com/assymfree.htm*

There's a lot more too.

And this you can find out by buying my latest book *Universities Asleep at the Switch* at Amazon.com or by reading it FREE simply by clicking the following links:

*http://www.amperefitz.com/unvasleep.htm* (This link is faster if you have dial up.)

*http://www.amperefitz.com/ua_20071020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf* (This is the book FREE in Adobe.).

Web pages are at: *http://www.amperefitz.com* & *http://www.rbduncan.com*

Thanks for reading this. Let me know what YOU think. e-mail is *Th1nker@indiainfo.com*

This page can be copied and published by anyone as long as it is copied and published in its entirety.

Feb. 23, 2010