Shedding a bit of light on
This important paper, by Fitzpatrick, brought to you free by
We have a fact we can't change and that is "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." This gives us a major problem believing the currently accepted idea of force carrying particles that simply hang around for eons until they end up ages later either doing something or nothing.
For that above "energy statement" to be correct then there must be instant energy transfer in that space-time realm of the energy production.
In a universe based on phase symmetry electrons and quarks have to transfer energy immediately in their own space-time reference frame, which from our point of view, is electron to electron transfer at the speed of light (c) or 3 x 108 meters per second, or quark to quark energy transfer at the square of the speed of light (c2) or 9 x 1016 meters per second.
These energy transfers all happen instantly in their own space-time reference frames even though we don't see it as instantly in our reference frame.We know the speed of light as the constant c. Also, a speed we can associate with c2, discovered by noted astronomer Tom Van Flandern, is close enough to Newton's instantaneous gravitational attraction to be accepted by most astronomers as another important constant:
Now you know exactly why and how these two constants were derived.
They were derived from two values of instantaneous happenings in the electron and quark space-time realms respectively.
As Einstein showed us, instantly in one reference frame is not always instantly in another reference frame: Yet it will be a constant in that other reference frame.
So the concept of the force carrying particle in phase symmetry changes a bit.
It may change a bit too much for some but that's what keeps happening in science as a few of us attempt to "shed a bit more light" on what is actually going on.
Let's examine what is really taking place if we consider both space and time in transfers of quanta of light energy from a distant star to your eye.
We see it takes almost eight minutes for sunlight to come to your eye from the sun in our reference frame.
Einstein's teacher, Hermann Minkowski, gave us a way to visualize what is really going on. Here's his picture of what is happening:
Minkowski claimed that we could only receive energy from a star if we and the star were on the same space-time light cone. If we were then we would receive an instant energy transfer via a geodesic on that space-time light cone.
Minkowski was close and in my next paper I'll show you exactly how it's working, but use this concept now.
When you look into the sky, everything you see there is on your Minkowski light cone, via a geodesic, therefore you can get an instant energy transfer from it to you.
Let's look at this now:
When you look at the sun, you are not seeing the present sun. You are seeing the sun as it was nearly eight minutes ago.
When you look at stars, you are seeing them the way they were years ago: Hence the term "light years" when talking about distance to stars.
Minkowski also told us space cannot be separated from time. Earth is surrounded not simply by space but by space-time.
So as you look at a star then all that light quanta comes to your eyes through both much time and much distance instantly.
If this is what you see your force carrying particle doing then phase symmetry accepts it — even though phase symmetry doesn't really need a force carrying particle concept.
All energy transfers in phase symmetry have to be via in phase impedance matched attractive bonds between spinning pairs.
Impedance matching means, this tiny in phase mass of the binding pair has to match or else there is no bonding or energy transfer.
Even though momentary, these bonds will resemble a sigma chemical bond where a spin up electron is spinning in the same plane with an opposite spin down electron and where a tiny portion of their closest sides are in phase, (like two opposite spinning gears meshing) thus attracting and bonding them together.In phase symmetry it's the mass of this in phase tiny portion that ends up as the energy quantum delivered from the star to your eye.
Whereas a sigma chemical bond lasts, your eye electron, can now swiftly switch bindings from the star, where it gains inertial mass via going to a higher orbit and then binding with a component in your eye, giving your eye the quantum of energy and losing that quantum of inertial mass by dropping to a lower orbit.
The energy transfer can happen because both star and eye electrons are bound together. Then the high energy of the star disrupts the bond: It moves the star electron's spin/orbit plane allowing the eye electron to re-bind back to a component in the eye giving the eye the quantum of energy from the star.
Many electrons in your eye are swiftly doing this over and over again allowing you to see things with your eyes.
This, in fact, is exactly how ALL energy transfers work, moving from a high energy level to a lower energy level.
A quantum of violet light has about twice the energy as a quantum of red light: But whatever the quantum of energy was from the star, that exact same amount of energy also comes into your eye.
Present science sees these quantum energy transfers being done as photons moving from the star to your eye. But it's an instant transferring photon, if you believe in force carrying particles. Certain units of energy are definitely moving this way and they are moving instantaneously from their point of view and according to the phase symmetry concept.
Phase symmetry allows spin up quarks to also bind and transfer energy to spin down quarks the same way electrons do. Phase symmetry also shows us that since these quarks that bond and transfer energy, spin at the square of the electron frequency, these energy quanta will be much, much higher than those from electrons. You can't call these photons however:
But if you insist in believing in force carrying particles you could indeed call one of these quark to quark transfers of energy a Higgs boson.
Sunday, January 18th 2015 DPFJr
p.s.Click on the following links to see more.
Why GR and Quantum theory work. 11-14-2014
Why GR and Quantum theory work. 11-14-2014 also in Adobe.pdf - whyGR.pdf
And then read:
Phase symmetry makes quantum theory more complete. 12-02-2013
Phase symmetry makes quantum theory more complete. 12-02-2013 also in Adobe.pdf - phase.symmetry.pdf
Read "More about Dark Matter and Dark Energy" FREE in html.
Read "More about Dark Matter and Dark Energy." FREE in ADOBE pdf.
If you copy this page with its linksto your computer then you will have some other pages (links - both htm and Adobe pdf) to read because I've only barely scratched the surface of things in this short paper.
Fitzpatrick's website is athttp://www.amperefitz.com
Another older website carrying Fitzpatrick's works FREE is:http://www.rbduncan.com
Thank you,World Scientist Database — — Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
4 Decades of writings of Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Have a good day & visit my site at goodreads:
Click ANY of theselinks to get what you want
Read my latest book FREE:(these two links below)
http://www.amperefitz.com/ua_20071020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf (This is the book in Adobe)
http://www.amperefitz.com/unvasleep.htm (This book link opens faster if you have dial up.)
While all the links on this page are OK and presently working, unfortunately only about two thirds (2/3) of the links I gave, years ago, as proof (click & see: http://www.amperefitz.com/presskit.html) for statements in this latest book, published in the year MMVl, are now still working BUT your search engine will probably take you to a similar area where you should be able to read similar proof material.
& super popular now:
QED — Feynman's Strange Theory of Light and Matter "Feynman's Strange Theory of Light and Matter"
http://amperefitz.com/einsteins.cos.c.htm Einstein's Cosmological Constant.
http://www.amperefitz.com/two.magnets.htm Two magnets will show you more than thousands of books.
http://amperefitz.com/exexshorttoe.html Extra short Theory of Everything.
http://www.amperefitz.com/45years.htm 45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together — of unifying Gravity with all the other forces.
http://www.amperefitz.com/question.htm "Ampere's Long Wire Law is a fact!"
http://www.amperefitz.com/why.general.relativity.htm Why we have General Relativity or why mass increases with speed."
http://amperefitz.com/answers.to.mendel.htm "Dan Fitzpatrick comments on Theoretical Physicist Mendel Sachs' Beliefs."
http://amperefitz.com/quarkmspin.htm "While the electron spin causes magnetism, GRAVITY & INERTIA are caused by the QUARK SPIN."
http://amperefitz.com/abstract.htm "ABSTRACT of scalar, standing wave concept."
http://amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm "It all begins with this all important science law."
http://amperefitz.com/energy.htm "All energy is a form of binding energy." (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick.
http://amperefitz.com/dark.m.e Why NASA tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6% Atoms.
http://amperefitz.com/gold1.html More wave and scalar wave questions answered by Fitzpatrick.
http://amperefitz.com/fermbos.htm ELECTRONS are fermions but not when paired spin up - spin down."
http://amperefitz.com/bond.strengths.htm "Sigma Bond strengths in the microcosm."
http://www.amperefitz.com/acceleratingexpandinguniverse.htm "Accelerating, expanding universe."
http://amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm "Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything."
Schrödinger's Universe Schrodinger's Universe
http://rbduncan.com/why.we.have.gravity.htm "Why we have GRAVITY and why we have Centrifugal Force.
http://amperefitz.com/einsteins.blunder.htm "Einstein's Biggest Blunder — Wasn't?"
http://amperefitz.com/plawrm.htm "Electrons normally repel BUT . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
http://www.rbduncan.com/letter_june2004.htm "And Hubble warned us this was NOT an expanding universe."
http://www.rbduncan.com/binary.htm Binary Stars act exactly like Electrons.
http://rbduncan.com/TOEbyFitzpatrick.htm A "Theory of Everything" by Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
http://www.rbduncan.com/letter_june2004.htm Newton and Einstein only gave us HALF the story.
http://www.rbduncan.com/mybook.htm "A New Science Tool" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick
http://rbduncan.com/Gspeed.htm "Speed of Gravity is 9x1016 meters per second."
http://rbduncan.com/phase.coherence.htm Phase Coherence and the Inverse Square law.
http://amperefitz.com/lisiimp.htm "Why Garrett Lisi's Model is so important."
http://amperefitz.com/ffacts.htm "Little Known Facts about Well known science Terms" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick.
Adobepdf links below give you more important actual science about what is really going on in our universe.
QUICK version of Ampere's Laws.
Two magnets will show you more than thousands of books.
Sigma bond strengths in the microcosm
"An important Quark message no one is heeding!"
45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together — of unifying Gravity with all the other forces."
"Ampere's Long Wire Law is a fact!"
"Affenstall Science Christmas Message"
"Dan Fitzpatrick comments on Theoretical Physicist Mendel Sachs' Beliefs."
"Why we have general relativity or why mass increases with speed."
"Fitz answers some Scalar Wave questions."
"And Hubble warned us this was NOT an expanding universe."
"Ampere really gave us this Relative Motion Law in 1825 for things he knew were moving in the wire (electrons)."
"Fitz talks about some basic problems in physics." — by Fitzpatrick.
"Little Known Facts about Well known science Terms" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick:
"Lisi's E8 model seems to show us why we get space & time!"
"Why Garrett Lisi's Model is so important."
"What Dr. Milo Wolff says connects with what A. G. Lisi is showing."
A radioman sees us all as radios tuned in to this universe.
WHEN DID YOU PUBLISH "Out-of-phase waves give us space and repulsive force."
But then Caroline - from Cambridge - repudiated what she had discovered: one of the most important scientific discoveries EVER MADE! Incredible! Simply Incredible!
"Why we have GRAVITY."
"Speed of Gravity is 9x1016 meters per second."
"Einstein's Principle of Equivalence or why gravity acts like acceleration."
Is Saul Perlmutter explaining the reason for us having the principle of equivalence?
"It's understanding the Binding Energy Curve" says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
"All energy is a form of binding energy." (science) e—letter by Fitzpatrick.
"Shedding light on Energy Quanta."
Sunday - January, 18, 2015 - This can be copied and distributed by anyone as long as it is copied and distributed in its entirety.
Daniel P.Fitzpatrick Jr.