SEE, — HOW the complexities of
FIELD THEORIES HID from us, the fact that relative motion (phase) between all these spinning entities, in the micro & macro universe, gives us all the attractive and repulsive Fundamental Forces.
Field Theories in html:

Also, Field Theories in Word:

& Field Theories in Adobe pdf:

Fitzpatrick's 1966 book showed the relative motion laws of A. Ampère unified the forces.
Fitz's first book in 1966

Fitz's 1966 book in PDF

EVERYTHING on these links herein are FREE, & NO pop up ads with these either.

This was the way the site --below-- looked many years ago. - - Dan Fitz.


These books & papers brought to you free by MAGPUL INDUSTRIES


Quantum Theorists are correct:

This is a frequency or wave universe in the microcosm.

But is it also a frequency/wave universe in the macrocosm as well?


Written by

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

who has not only written some top notch books
but also has pulled together
--- as
MAGPUL sees ---
a great number of scientific facts that show us
a universe almost no one has even considered.



Dr. Milo Wolff 1 showed us that the electron is a scalar, spinning, standing wave, entity that receives and transmits energy to/from its surrounding electrons all the way out to the Hubble limit where this energy exchange ceases. It's important that you know this and that you know the quark is also a scalar, spinning, standing wave entity and that an important quark spin frequency is the square -- a resonance -- of the electron spin frequency.

The most important theme in mathematician Stephen Wolfram's best seller, his 1,000 page A New Kind of Science, is this:

"Mathematics can explain simple things but it takes a model to explain complicated things, however, a simple model can explain a complicated universe."


Absolutely true! And dear readers, you may witness and "see" the very first simple model that finally explains our entire complicated universe.



The simple model that can best explain our entire complicated universe is Dr. Milo Wolff''s spinning, scalar, standing wave that -- if it has motion, which it does -- must also have a vector spin component that will orient itself and its neighbors in the best manner so as to preserve standing wave perpetuation by keeping everything perfectly balanced, and far enough apart wavelength-wise, in respect to the mean or average of its surrounding, moving, neighbor standing waves.

This vector spin component will, of necessity, play its vector role, creating either an attracting or repelling force to alter the position and stabilization necessary for standing wave perpetuation.



After seeing this we must then note that all radio receivers must be limited to a certain frequency band or a limited number of frequency bands. Any radio receiver, ever built, has had a limited range of frequencies it can receive.

There is no such thing as a single radio receiver that can cover everything from the high ultra violet light frequency down to the lowest radio frequency. However, human beings can actually notice or "see" a tremendous amount of this range. Please excuse my use of the word "see" herein; its use is not quite correct but it does indeed explain the following picture in simple terms.

In the micro world certain rules and math are used for a certain frequency band (gauge - a term used by quantum theorists) whereas entirely different rules and math are used for a different frequency band (gauge).

Can it be possible that these different gauges are really entirely different space-time realms? If they are then we see the reason for the term c2 appearing in our math.

In the quark realm the (QCD gauge) rules and math are entirely different from the electron realm (QED gauge). Nevertheless, there seems to be a vague symmetry existing not only between these two different gauges but also the same vague symmetry exists between the microcosm and macrocosm as well: for instance, in each case there is this seemingly tremendous amount of empty space between each of the individual units, that also show evidence of spin, regardless of which gauge they are in.

The reason for all this similar symmetry of empty space and spin throughout microcosm and macrocosm is because this really is a frequency universe all throughout. We, as humans, see the higher quark and electron frequencies as actual frequencies but then we see things below the electron orbital frequencies as solids even though these solids are themselves built of various scalar, spinning, standing wave entities.

But galactic spin frequencies are even lower than this and we observe these much lower frequency spinning galaxies as variegated solids.

Hence we observe or "see" the higher frequencies as frequencies and the next lower frequency range as solids and the next lower frequency range as variegated solids.

Therefore, in this all frequency universe we see neither spins nor excessive empty space at our own frequency -- where we see things as solids, liquids and gasses -- but both spins and excessive empty space appear to us at both higher and lower frequencies than ours. This tells us what Lorentz's relativity first showed us: that we are not seeing space correctly.

So if we see things -- at our own frequency -- behaving as solids then will electrons at their own frequency behave as solids, spinning and orbiting as believed by Niels Bohr and previous physicists? I've already given the proof 2 that they do in -- why the pi bond is weaker than the sigma bond -- (It's about a third of the way down in that2 paper.).

Therefore, Niels Bohr may have been correct and the electron may be behaving as a solid in its own frequency band (gauge) whereas we can see it only as a frequency or wave.

Kurt Gödel proved -- Gödel's Proof -- that if scientists could not see this entire universe then these scientists might think they had universal truths when all they had were rules for their small subset system.

That's exactly what happened to us: we have no one set of laws for this entire universe. All we have are subset rules that we use in these various subset gauges.

Einstein also warned everyone about using rules that required the field concept in 1954 when he said, "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Einstein was right. You cannot use concepts that require fields if you want to see how this entire universe works because the field concept can only be used when there are a tremendous number of quanta. Not only that but by using this field concept, half the picture is missing because the surroundings are not being considered (Mach's principle). So what are we still using? Even more than half a century, after Einstein's warning, we are still using gravitational fields, magnetic fields, plus and minus charges which use fields and the list goes on and on for these worthless subset gauge concepts that also use the useless field concept.

Do we have laws that work in all gauges that also don't require fields? Yes, they were given to us by Ampere -- who the Amp is named after -- plus they show why quanta work and why we have Mach's principle and inertia, which the field laws don't; plus Ampere's laws show why we have gravity.

General relativity equates force with space and we can do exactly the same in the microcosm equating both force and space with both the electron and quark spin frequencies: Space being the average out of phase condition and attractive force being caused as things are more in phase than this average out of phase (space) condition and repulsive force being when things are more out of phase than this average out of phase (space) condition.3 Seeing things this way, space becomes quantized along with energy.

For instance, picture the electron to be a solid, as Nobel laureate Niels Bohr claimed; enlarge it to the size of a basket-ball. Make two electrons, of that size, have opposite spins, both spinning in the same equatorial spin plane. Please note that there will then always be two razor blade thin sections of their closest sides that will always be perfectly in phase with each other and therefore far more attracted to each other than the rest of the portions of the two electrons. This, in fact, is the cause of sigma bonding between two electrons in chemical bonding. These razor blade thin in phase sections of the closest sides of these spin up--spin down electrons are also the reason for Cooper pairs of electrons and the reason energy is only delivered in quantum units. (Click blue links to see a better explanation of Ampere's phase laws: or for more detailed views Ampere's Laws and and )

What's incredible for me to believe is that Ampere gave us his relative motion phase laws in 1824-25 because he knew something -- later discovered to be electrons -- were moving inside copper wires causing magnetism in iron and this electromotive force of attraction and repulsion between the copper wires themselves. These relative motion laws for either attraction or repulsion, given to us by Ampere, are also phase laws that perfectly fit our all frequency universe and can replace all the laws we have now PLUS they work in both the microcosm and macrocosm. In other words they give us the answer Einstein tried to find that unified gravity with ALL the other forces. How can it be that no one else, as yet, has even published this noteworthy fact? Here's another link to Ampere's laws:

Electrons in your eye and electrons on a star are many light years distant -- but if they have opposite spins and are lined up exactly in phase and are bonded together -- then those ultra thin portions of your eye electrons and the ultra thin portions of the star electrons -- that give you various quanta of light from the star -- have to be considered in the same space and time even though all those electrons themselves are not. Remember, space -- that you know you are not seeing correctly -- has to be considered as nothing but the average out of phase amount in this all frequency universe.

This is also why after hundreds of billions of years of the stars converting everything to iron, which is that particular molecular average out of phase atomic space condition -- and the atomic energy ash heap as well because no atomic energy is available from iron -- that the lights will finally go out in our universe.

We can see that space for the electron (related to its spin frequency c) multiplied by itself becomes a harmonic c2 or from our point of view an acceleration. But, what is c2?

Well, it's a mathematical term for the speed of light squared. A speed squared? That makes me, and indeed a good many other mathematicians, ponder a bit! Even though it appears in our math, can a speed actually be squared?

What we do know, however, is that a speed times itself is most certainly an acceleration. (In reality we are actually squaring a frequency -- the electron spin frequency -- that we behold as a speed and the square of which -- the quark spin frequency -- we behold as acceleration.)

Now, if it's this quark spin giving us gravity and inertia (read these other papers) 4 then we can see why squaring the electron spin frequency (to the quark spin frequency c2) makes gravity indistinguishable from an acceleration. 5

Scientists know the electron spin gives us magnetic force and now, if you have read some of my other papers, you can see that it is the quark spin being a resonant frequency of the electron spin -- the square of the electron spin -- that gives us gravitational force. This resonance, by the way, is the reason that gravity bends light.

Look at earth's gravitational force: it's a scalar acceleration of 32 feet per second, per second in all directions. Therefore gravity's equal but opposite force (Einstein's Cosmological Constant) would also have to be seen by us as a scalar acceleration in all directions as well. And we do see Einstein's Cosmological Constant force as an all directional scalar, accelerating force: we see Einstein's -- opposite force of gravity -- as an accelerating, scalar expansion (an accelerating, expanding universe) when in reality all we are actually viewing is this force (Einstein's Cosmological Constant) in a steady state universe.


Horror of horrors: Fred Hoyle 6 was right all the time!


The "Principle of Equivalence" states that we cannot distinguish gravity from an acceleration. If this is true then this same "Principle of Equivalence" must also tell us that we cannot discern gravity's equal but opposite force (Einstein's Cosmological Constant) from an acceleration either.

Which means well known British astronomer Fred Hoyle, who gave us the popular phrase "Big Bang" was absolutely correct. We are in a steady state universe that has Einstein's Cosmological Constant Force in it holding everything apart just as it does in the microcosm keeping that in a steady state as well.

Of course! Because this is really a frequency universe all throughout and if it appears to be steady state in the microcosm then it would also have to appear to be steady state in the macrocosm as well --- and it does!

We are therefore in a steady state universe with (Einstein's Cosmological Constant) in it, holding all the stars and galaxies apart, that we cannot distinguish from an accelerating, expanding universe. ("Principle of Equivalence")


January 26, 2013 and revised Jan. 31, 2013



"Unfortunately, it is also a dictum of history that the intellectual establishment is the last to accept new ideas."

Dr. Ravi Batra


1 Dr. Milo Wolff




3 a phase universe


4 While the electron spin causes magnetism, GRAVITY & INERTIA are caused by the QUARK SPIN.


5 Click this and see WHY gravity must act like an acceleration (Principle of Equivalence)




If you copy this page with its links to your computer then you will have plenty of other pages (links -- both htm and Adobe pdf) to read because I've only barely scratched the surface of things in this short paper.



Fitzpatrick's website is at


Another older website carrying Fitzpatrick's works FREE is:



There was a full page in the New York Times devoted exclusively about Fitzpatrick's First Book on June 18th 1967.

"Fitzpatrick's First Book" also in Adobe.pdf - pge1.pdf

Click above links to read that first book of mine free.

I've found out and published a lot more since then: Over 4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts

And here's this page duplicated in Adobe.pdf:


 Thank you, World Scientist Database - - Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

Have a good day & visit my site at goodreads:

Click ANY of these links to get what you want



Read my latest book FREE: (these two links below) (This is the book in Adobe)

or (This book link opens faster if you have dial up.)

While all the links on this page are OK and presently working, unfortunately only about two thirds (2/3) of the links I gave, years ago, as proof (click & see: for statements in this latest book, published in the year MMVl, are now still working BUT your search engine will probably take you to a similar area where you should be able to read similar proof material.



FREE !! Click ANY of these links below to get what you want. FREE !!


c.squared.html 11-25-2017

c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017 (Adobe)

c.squared.doc 11-25-2017 (Word)

& super popular now:

QED - Feynman's Strange Theory of Light and Matter "Feynman's Strange Theory of Light and Matter" Einstein's Cosmological Constant. Two magnets will show you more than thousands of books. Extra short Theory of Everything. 45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with all the other forces. "Ampere's Long Wire Law is a fact!" Why we have General Relativity or why mass increases with speed." "Dan Fitzpatrick comments on Theoretical Physicist Mendel Sachs' Beliefs." "While the electron spin causes magnetism, GRAVITY & INERTIA are caused by the QUARK SPIN." "ABSTRACT of scalar, standing wave concept." "It all begins with this all important science law." "All energy is a form of binding energy." (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick. Why NASA tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6% Atoms. More wave and scalar wave questions answered by Fitzpatrick. ELECTRONS are fermions but not when paired spin up-spin down." "Sigma Bond strengths in the microcosm." "Accelerating, expanding universe." "Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything."

Schrödinger's Universe Schrodinger's Universe "Why we have GRAVITY and why we have Centrifugal Force. "Einstein's Biggest Blunder -- Wasn't?" "Electrons normally repel BUT . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. "And Hubble warned us this was NOT an expanding universe." Binary Stars act exactly like Electrons. A "Theory of Everything" by Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr. Bosons? Newton and Einstein only gave us HALF the story. "A New Science Tool" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick "Speed of Gravity is 9x1016 meters per second." Phase Coherence and the Inverse Square law. "Why Garrett Lisi's Model is so important." "Little Known Facts about Well known science Terms" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick.

Mach's principle

Stephen Wolfram

Adobe pdf links below give you more important actual science about what is really going on in our universe.

QUICK version of Ampere's Laws.


Two magnets will show you more than thousands of books.


Sigma bond strengths in the microcosm


"An important Quark message no one is heeding!"


45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with all the other forces."


"Ampere's Long Wire Law is a fact!"


"Affenstall Science Christmas Message"


"Dan Fitzpatrick comments on Theoretical Physicist Mendel Sachs' Beliefs."


"Why we have general relativity or why mass increases with speed."


"Fitz answers some Scalar Wave questions."


"And Hubble warned us this was NOT an expanding universe."


"Ampere really gave us this Relative Motion Law in 1825 for things he knew were moving in the wire (electrons)."


"Fitz talks about some basic problems in physics." - by Fitzpatrick.


"Little Known Facts about Well known science Terms" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick:


"Lisi's E8 model seems to show us why we get space & time!"


"Why Garrett Lisi's Model is so important."


"What Dr. Milo Wolff says connects with what A. G. Lisi is showing."


 A radioman sees us all as radios tuned in to this universe.


WHEN DID YOU PUBLISH "Out-of-phase waves give us space and repulsive force."


But then Caroline - from Cambridge - repudiated what she had discovered: one of the most important scientific discoveries EVER MADE! Incredible! Simply Incredible!


"Why we have GRAVITY."


"Speed of Gravity is 9x1016 meters per second."


"Einstein's Principle of Equivalence or why gravity acts like acceleration."


 Is Saul Perlmutter explaining the reason for us having the principle of equivalence?


"It's understanding the Binding Energy Curve" says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"All energy is a form of binding energy." (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick.


"Shedding light on Energy Quanta."


"The Complete Binding Energy Model."


TOP SPOT in Google.


Phase Coherence and the Inverse Square law.


"Fitz finds a FACT": Phase Coherence is the reason for the binding attractive force in ALL the 4 fundamental forces.


"to Brian: Phase Coherence is the reason for the binding attractive force in ALL the 4 fundamental forces."


Click the following pdf link to see WHY this is a phase universe.


"Scalar phase relationship."


"Wave and Scalar Wave facts."


Schrödinger's Universe


Extra - Extra Short ToE


"Short Theory of Everything" - by Fitzpatrick.


Fitzpatrick's USR Laws.


Fitzpatrick's USR Laws.


Do we now have a Relative Motion type "Theory of Everything"?


"The Invisible Forces"


"Beta Decay BIG BANG"


"Too many spacetime realms for a mathematical Theory of Everything" says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"What is a Wave Front?" (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick posted everywhere.


"Sigma and Pi Chemical Bonding Forces similar to Magnetism?" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick


"Dr. Milo Wolff & Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. talk."


"Dr. Milo Wolff's Wave Structure of Matter"


"Dr. Milo Wolff answers some Scalar Wave questions asked by Fitzpatrick." (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick


"Understanding Dr. Milo Wolff's Scalar Standing Wave."


"And I agree with Milo about this too"


"The Milo Wolff - Albert Einstein model of the universe."


"Dr. Milo Wolff's Wavelength Density formula"


Talking to Dr. Milo Wolff about the "Wave Structure of Matter" - - by Fitzpatrick


"Milo Wolff said & I agree . . ."


"Milo Wolff sees the Einstein picture."


"Milo Wolff e-mail"


"One - Two -- Three --- General Relativity"


"Understanding the Standing Wave aspect of Space & Time" (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick


"Euclidean geometric motion used by Newton" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick


"Understanding Spin and Isospin."


"Yes, the Strong force acts in this manner . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"A NEW Cosmology . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Quark spin is not conserved? - - Whoops!"


"Why NASA tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6% Atoms"


"From where do we get the quantity c squared?"


"Unified Field Laws or German Aufbau laws"


"Universal Quantum Coupling"


"You must be aware of the translational motion in all of this."


"More from Tony Bermanseder about quarks."


"Time Dilation."


"Quantum theory vs General Relativity"


"Einstein's Cosmological constant"


"Why the quarks have assymptotic freedom."


"Accelerating, expanding universe"


"Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything"


"Shades of Einstein & Fred Hoyle"


"Einstein's Biggest Blunder -- Wasn't?"


"Bose Einstein Condensate is proof this is a frequency universe."


"Electrons normally repel BUT . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Vector - Scalar relationship between Force, Space and Time"


"CAUTION using the DeBroglie wavelength formula!"


"Why do we have 3D Space-Time?"


"A Simple Program"


"Steven Wolfram wants a reasonable notion of Space and Time"


"Determining mass via Scattering"


REPLY to Dave Bacon in "The Quantum Pontif"


ELECTRONS are fermions but not when paired spin up-spin down"


"Consider this possibility of Time & Space"


"We are tuned into this universe like a superheterodyne radio."


"The "A" Laws"


"Cahill's Quantum Foam theory"


"The importance of SCALAR waves"


"Aufbau Laws"


"Fitzpatrick's letter to Charles Scott"


"Lost in Translation" by Fitzpatrick


"Limits to Logic"


"More of Fitzpatrick's letters"


"3D plus Time - Caveat!" by Fitzpatrick


"Photon" by Fitzpatrick


Click the following pdf link to see what a PHOTON really is:


"Relative Motion Theory"


Einstein's most important Discovery


"Fitzpatrick's view"


Expanding Universe Religion"


Houtman's findings


This universe is an Aether Universe that can be quantized into a phase universe of quanta chunks of Aether.


"It's a Scalar, Standing Wave Universe!"


"Stephen Wolfram is absolutely RIGHT and Freeman Dyson is WRONG!"


"I was somewhat wrong on this one . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Our natural laws" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Shedding light on energy quanta " - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Standard Model concept of the particle" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Our natural laws" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Itzhak Bars is correct!" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"electron and its spin are both separate scalar, standing wave frequencies" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"This universe is a quantum computer!" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


Changes to "Universities Asleep at the Switch" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


I thanked brannenworks for this important concept!


To the Theory of everything Group - "Einstein's Coswmological Constant." - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"c & c2 are scalar, standing wave PERIODS!" 9/13/2004 - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR)" 3/4/2004 - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"My life in Miami, Milo" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.


"Started my flying in a piper cub."


"In the quantum world, frequency and energy end up the same, Caroline."


STEADY STATE now: Einstein's cosmological constant force equals accelerated space.


Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.